Chess is a scientific game and its literature ought to be placed on the basis of the strictest truthfulness, which is the foundation of all scientific research. W._Steinitz

The Blackburne-Zukertort Match,
London 1881
Researched by Nick Pope

    The thirteenth game of the match, played at Simpson’s on Wednesday, the 27th inst.
    This game will be one of the most memorable match games on record, owing to its extraordinary curious termination, as well as it vicissitudes in the middle part, and taking into consideration the state of the score at the time, which, as our readers are aware, has been most precarious for Blackburne since the end of last week.  The opening, 1. P to Q B 4, resolved itself into a Q gambit declined, with the fianchetto on the Q side for both parties.  Blackburne chose the questionable post at Q R 3 for his Q Kt, and made it positively unfavourable by omitting to exchange his Q B P for the adverse Q P, which enabled the opponent ultimately to form a strong centre.  Another weak advance of the K B P, to the 4th instead of to the 3rd square, gave Zukertort an opportunity of fixing his pawns strongly from K B 4 to Q 6, with a formidable passed Q P, at the same time blocking up the adverse K B uselessly at K R 3.  Instead, however, of securing his position on the K side by P to K R 4, Zukertort placed his Q into inactivity at K R 3.  On the 33rd move Zukertort allowed his pawns to be broken up unnecessarily on the K side, instead of moving the K into the corner, which would have kept his fortified position intact.  He only gained a doubled P temporarily thereby, and we believe Blackburne could then have obtained the superiority by Kt to B 2, in lieu of Kt to B 3, actually played.  Blackburne then tried to relieve himself by liberating his Q B P, and actually succeeded in exchanging queens, and breaking up the adverse centre by a fine sacrifice of a R, the full value of which he immediately recovered.  But instead of retaining his Kt on the 45th move by Kt to Kt sq, which would have secured his getting rid of the adverse dangerous passed P at Q 7, he allowed it to be exchanged for the R, and his game then became hopeless to all appearance, for that P was bound to cost a clear piece, while Black’s passed Q B P could be stopped by the K.  The match seemed to be virtually over, and Blackburne’s best friends must have considered him fully justified in resigning the game at that stage.  But he held on with his defence in a most stubborn manner, and bodly [sic] accepted the exchange of rooks, which left him only to fight with the K and a P, against the adverse Kt and two pawns.  Zukertort could have won easily at several subsequent points—namely, on the sixty-fifth move, by Kt to B 6, getting rid of Blackburne’s last P, for if that P advanced to R 3, he could capture, giving up the Kt, and his Kt P was in time to effect the support of the R P.  Again, three moves later on, he might have forced a win by bringing his K immediately to B 4, instead of to B 3, with the view of abandoning the Kt ultimately, but only after forcing the adverse K up to B 8, where the Kt should have been posted, while in the meantime White’s K could cross over to the K side and fetch the R P.  But, by a singular infatuation, he ran into the very position which Blackburne had been aiming at as a last resource.  The manner in which Black draws this game with a clear piece behind will be a most instructive lesson to the students of endings.  Mr Blackburne informs us that he first hit on this ingenious resource, which he also succeeded in carrying out here, in a similar position which he had against Mr M‘Donnell about fifteen years ago.  He then effected a draw with a piece minus, though there were two pawns left on each side.  Zukertort tried in vain to get the opposition, with the object of dislodging the hostile K and of abandoning the Kt, and then to gain the P.  Had Black’s P been pushed one step further, the game would have been won for White by that process; but Blackburne wisely refrained from touching that P, and on finding, after several dodging attempts, that Blackburne judiciously persisted in only manœuvring his K, Zukertort gave up the game as drawn.
    Duration, eight hours.
Zukertort,JH — Blackburne,JH
(13)
D37/01
Queen’s Gambit Declined
1881.07.27
GBR London (Simpson’s Divan)
Annotations by Wilhelm Steinitz
1.c4 e6 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.a3 b6 4.Nc3 Bb7 5.e3 d5 6.d4 Be7 7.b3 0-0 8.Bb2 dxc4 9.bxc4 c5 10.Be2 Na6 
We repeat that the natural post for the b-knight is at c3.
11.0-0 Ne4 
This causes him only loss of time, and gives the opponent the desired opportunity of liberating his f-pawn for the eventual advance.
12.Nxe4 Bxe4 13.Nd2 Bb7 14.Qc2 Qc7 
It was now the highest time to exchange the c-pawn for the d-pawn, in order to have a convenient square at c5 for the knight should the hostile d-pawn advance.  14...Nc7 was also better than the move in the text.
15.d5 
Excellent play, whereby he establishes the superiority of position for his side.  Obviously Black cannot capture twice, as the knight would be left en prise of the bishop.
15...Rad8 16.e4 f5 
Bad.  16...f6 was the right defense, for White would gain nothing by taking the e-pawn, as he could not subsequently support it sufficiently.
17.Qc3 Bg5 18.f4 Bh6 19.e5 Nb8 20.d6 Qf7 21.Qh3 
An ill-favored post for the queen, which might have been made much more useful on the queenside.  21.h4 followed soon, if necessary, by g3, was the right plan for the purpose of blocking the adverse dark-square bishop and keeping his own kingside secure against the eventual advance to the g-pawn, more especially as it was always left open to him of getting his king into safe quarters, viá f2, in case of emergency.
21...Nc6 22.Rad1 Kh8 23.Nb3 Rg8 24.Bf3 Rd7 25.g3 Qf8 26.Rd3 [1:00-?:??] 26...Nd8 
This offer of exchange is ill-judged, as it only gives additional scope of action to the adverse queen, which naturally would try to get into play next at g2.  26...Qc8 at once was preferable.
27.Bxb7 Nxb7 28.Qg2 g6 29.a4 Bg7 30.Bc3 Qc8 [?:??-2:00] 31.Nd2 Nd8 32.a5 g5 33.fxg5 
We believe his capture compromises at least his advantage, if not his position altogether.  33.Kh1 left his position on the kingside unbroken, for obviously, after exchanging pawns, Black could not capture the e-pawn with the bishop, as it would be retaken, with a check.
33...Nc6 
An error of judgment, of which his opponent avails himself cleverly.  33...Nf7 was the right move, which would have either recovered one of the pawns on the kingside, or would have given him time, if White defended both by 34.Nf3, to attack the c-pawn by 34...Qa6.
34.axb6 axb6 35.Re1 
An important, fine move, and of course much superior to 35.Nf3 at once, as Black has no time now to attack the c-pawn with the queen, since his knight remains undefended.
35...Qb7 36.Nf3 Rf8 37.Nh4 b5 38.cxb5 [2:00-?:??] 38...Qxb5 39.Rd2 c4 40.Rb2 Qc5+ 41.Qf2 Qxf2+ 42.Rxf2 Rxd6 
Most ingenious.  Black conducts the defense admirably.
43.exd6 Bxc3 44.Rxe6 Bd4 45.d7 Ne5 
A gross error, which causes a serious relapse in his position.  It was quite evident that he required the knight, in order to catch the dangerous passed d-pawn on a white square, and the black bishop was of no use to him for the defense.  45...Nb8 was the proper move.  If, then, 46.Rd6, he would take the other rook 46...Bf2+, followed by 47...Rd8; and, after getting rid of the d-pawn with the knight, he could struggle for a draw on the merits of the position with more legitimate hope.
46.Rxe5 Bxe5 47.Rxf5 Bd4+ [?:??-3:00] 48.Kf1 Rd8 49.Rd5 Bb6 50.Nf3 Kg7 51.Ne5 c3 52.Ke2 Bc7 53.Nc6 Rf8 54.d8Q Bxd8 55.Nxd8 c2 56.Kd2 Rf2+ 57.Kc1 Rxh2 58.Ne6+ Kf7 59.Nf4 Ke7 60.Rd2 Rh1+ 61.Kxc2 Ra1 62.Kb3 Ra5 63.Rd5 Rxd5 64.Nxd5+ Ke6 65.Ne3 
Good enough still, but 65.Nf6 was immediately decisive; for, if Black answered 65...h6, White would capture it, followed by 67.g4 and 68.g5.  On the other hand, if 65...Kf5, the game must have proceeded thus: 65.Nf6 Kf5 66.Nxh7 Kg6 67.Nf6 Kxg5 68.Ne4+; and, if the 68...Kf5, the winning answer is 69.Nf2.  On the other hand, if 68...Kg5, the white king comes up.
65...Ke5 66.Kc3 Ke4 67.Kd2 
Even now he could have won by force, if he had retreated 67.Nf1, e.g.: 67.Nf1 Kf3 (if 67...Kf5, White will cut off the king by 68.Nh2, winning easily afterwards by brining his own king to the kingside.) 68.Kd4 Kf2 69.Ke5 Kxf1 70.Kf6, and wins.
67...Kf3 68.g4 
Neither 68.Nf1 nor 68.Nf5 would have availed him anything now by best play, e.g., in the first place: 68.Nf1 Kf2 69.Kd3 Kxf1 70.Ke3 Kg2 71.Kf4 Kh3 72.Kf3 Kh2 73.Kg4 Kg2 and he must draw if he keeps always near this pawn at g3, and only follows it up whenever it advances.  Secondly: 68.Nf5 Kg4 69.Nd6 Kxg3 70.Ke3 Kg4 71.Nf7 Kf5, followed by 72...Kg6, and draws.
68...Kf4 69.g6 hxg6 70.Ke2 Kg3 [?:??-4:00] 
We give a diagram of this remarkably fine position.  Black’s last move was the only one to secure the draw, for if 70...Kg5, the white king would come near at f3; and if 70...Ke5, the knight would cut him off from future entrance by 71.Ng2.
71.Ke1 Kf3 72.Kd2 Kf4 73.Kd3 Kf3 74.Kd4 Kf4 75.Kd3 
It would be useless to try to win by abandoning the knight, e.g.: 75.Kd5 Kxe3 76.Ke5 Kf3, and of course 77.Kf6 draws, but if White now advances the pawn, he actually loses thus: 77.g5 Kg4 78.Kf6 Kh5 and wins.  As already noticed in the introduction, if Black’s pawn stood now at g5, White could win by 75.Kd5; but Blackburne, with fine insight into this beautiful position, did not advance his pawn, and only moved the king, thereby securing the draw.
75...Kf3 76.Kd2 Kf4 ½-½. [3:42-4:11] 
White’s third hour was not marked on the scoresheet handed over to us, but we are informed by Zukertort that the exact time used by the two players 3 hours 42 minutes for White, and 4 hours 11 minutes for Black.
The Field, London, 1881.07.30
 

Return to Match Index

[Excavations] [Library] [Museum] [Journal] [Market] [Openings]
© 1999-2001 Jacques N. Pope. All Rights Reserved.